Mauriac's testimony
François Mauriac was known for being très catholique, very conservative, and with a very ferocious relationship with Sartre. Sartre really attacked him in print in 1939 (I think it was), ending his article "God is not an artist, and neither is François Mauriac". Stick that in your pipe and smoke it! We had to read the article and discuss it in Séminaire de Littérature, and what Sartre was really attacking was the whole idea of any limit on human freedom whatsoever. Even character. To be free one must be utterly unpredictable. Random. Chaotic.
Well, anyone who attracts the vitriol of Sartre must be a good fellow, so I bought a copy of Mauriac's newspaper columns ("Bloc-notes") for 1958 - 1960, because I wanted to know what he had written about the May 1968 riots. (Yes, I know. When I got it out at home I realised I'd got the decade wrong... And they think I am good with technical things...)
Anyway, I flicked through it yesterday evening and lit on an article written on Good Friday 1958, which was really a personal testimony.
He spoke of how his faith rested on history, not myth, and of how history cannot be discarded simply with a word like that.
The article resounded with a straightfoward gospel Christian faith. It was good to read it.
Well, anyone who attracts the vitriol of Sartre must be a good fellow, so I bought a copy of Mauriac's newspaper columns ("Bloc-notes") for 1958 - 1960, because I wanted to know what he had written about the May 1968 riots. (Yes, I know. When I got it out at home I realised I'd got the decade wrong... And they think I am good with technical things...)
Anyway, I flicked through it yesterday evening and lit on an article written on Good Friday 1958, which was really a personal testimony.
He spoke of how his faith rested on history, not myth, and of how history cannot be discarded simply with a word like that.
He spoke of his certainty in the truth of the Bible, though that truth had been attacked in his youth to such an extent that for some time he had not read John's gospel - until he worked through the attack and his confidence in the word was restored.
He went on to quote John's gospel and spoke of how Jesus had said that his sheep would know his voice and would follow him.The article resounded with a straightfoward gospel Christian faith. It was good to read it.
Comments
Mauriac has driven me to the keyboard. I studied one of his books - Noeud de vipères - for A level and was really impressed by it. The eponymous noeud de vipères is the heart of the protagonist, though it takes him most of the novel to recognise this and to come to the
conclusion that the only one who can deal with it is God. It might not have been the language I would have used at 18, but I recognised that it was a graphic account of coming to faith. The fact that I can still remember it is a recommendation.