One difference between we French and the anglo-saxon mindset is that
I was chatting with the dad of a friend of Gwilym. He works for a multinational aeronautics firm, so he speaks pretty good English (though we stuck to French), he knows that Welsh culture is different from English culture (hurrah !) and ... wait for it ... he has visited Cwmcarn many times. He said, "Of course, one difference between the French and the Anglo-Saxon mindset is that we are very logical while you are very pragmatic." I think I looked puzzled and doubtful... "You must do something", he said, "and if that does not work then you will change and do something else until you find out what does work. We must reflect before we do anything." He's so right. Although the verb 'to reflect' exists in English I don't think I ever used it and I certainly never did it. I MUCH prefer to do SOMETHING than nothing, even if it is the wrong thing. After all, in a crisis to do nothing is usually the wrong thing. However here in France I find that w...
Comments
As are (were) you.
You must agree that the word "probably" is most apt, from a scientific viewpoint. The BHS didn't choose that wording by hazard, nor did they choose it as the article you linked to suggests to be more soft sell, or appealing.
They used the word "probably" because God's nonexistance is not provable. Russell's teapot, Church of the FSM and Carl Sagan's dragon, I'm sure you are familiar with the arguments.
If the slogan said "There is definitely no god..." then you'd have a stick to beat Dawkins with.