A -HA !

I have long suspected that Richard Dawkins "doth protest too much".

"Probably"...?

Comments

Stew said…
Dawkins is a scientist.

As are (were) you.

You must agree that the word "probably" is most apt, from a scientific viewpoint. The BHS didn't choose that wording by hazard, nor did they choose it as the article you linked to suggests to be more soft sell, or appealing.

They used the word "probably" because God's nonexistance is not provable. Russell's teapot, Church of the FSM and Carl Sagan's dragon, I'm sure you are familiar with the arguments.

If the slogan said "There is definitely no god..." then you'd have a stick to beat Dawkins with.

Popular posts from this blog

A bit about music exams in UK and France

Good news from my sermon buddy

A brief sortie to North Wales