Genesis 1 again

We finished reading Esther, so we decided to read Exodus next. So we turned to Genesis 1 to get the context (it seemed the right thing to do at the time).

Catrin read the chapter. (In English, though she picked up a Welsh Bible first!)

And as she read I was struck again by the sheer ... majesty of the chapter.

It is so simple. No histrionics or grandiose effects. God spoke and it all came into being.

The seed-bearing vegetation. I love plants. I love fruit. Big long green cucumbers. Round melons like bowling balls. (Same family, aren't they?) Squishy, pulpy tomatoes. Fuzzy peaches. (There's a peach tree in the church garden that has white peaches. They're delicious! Ripened on the tree. OK, there's the occasional mite moving on the flesh - but hey, this is France. The mite gets eaten too.) Grapes. Bananas! Apples. And we haven't even started to get exotic yet.

It puts man in his place. We are really very good at destroying, but we can't create. Not create. We can manipulate things, change things, arrange things, but that's all.

But from his mind, from his word, springs this vast, rich, good diversity.

And the stars! "He also made the stars".

It shows how important man is.

Stars are big! Powerful! Distant! Amazing!

But they aren't people. Only mankind is made in God's image.

And fruit wasn't made for the stars!

As Catrin read "Let us make man in our image", Gwilym interjected "That shows that Jesus was there, too."

Comments

Anonymous said…
I well remember hearing a speaker say that a device that the Devil uses is to divert preaching from Genesis and Revelation as they, along with the gospels are what bring the most adverse attention to him, so he seems to convince people that they are too difficult to understand properly. There would seem to be some merit in that assertion though I have to say I have heard many sermons from Genesis. However, it does seem as though there is at least some reluctance on the part of some speakers to preach on the creation. Possibly not comfortably fashionable! What a shame: therein is revealed the total, awesome Majesty of the Godhead and the wonder of His creation, which to my mind at least,is being displayed more and more, day by day, as mankind discovers areas of His own 'big bang' brought about by the words of His mouth. How tremendous is that? I have difficulty in worshipping Him because I am aware that my mind can't get itself around His real magnificence and so my poor efforts at praise seem unworthy and stilted. Yet that's what He wants of me. Wow!

As for Revelation, well that's a different story. I do think we tend to fight shy of that and probably understandably so to some extent. Yet we have the opening chapter (Genesis) of the 'book' and it's incomplete, just unfinished, without the final chapter, whatever we make of it. It still points to God'S sovereignty and purpose.
12:40 pm
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A bit about music exams in UK and France

They're really different. I think I have already mentioned that while in the UK people generally find a private teacher for their instrument, or do it through a school scheme, here there are municipal music school, conservatoires and so on. The situation is a little more complex than I had first understood, because the schools vary in the rigidity of their organisation: the most, the conservatoires, next the municipals, then the associations. Our music school is an association, but it tends to apply the standards of the municipal schools with its programme of cycles, etc. Britain - grade 1 to 8, grade 8 being roughly equivalent to A-level, pre university/conservatoire. France - 3 cycles, each taking about 4 years, with 3ème cycle being roughly equivalent to grade 8. Theory of music - UK to take grade 8 you need theory grade 5. In France you study theory alongside your instrumental studies, very slowly. Catrin's flute music is MUCH more difficult than the stuff she does in theor...
Read more

Good news from my sermon buddy

Yesterday we went over my script from August 13. There really wasn't much she had taken exception to. Once or twice she wondered quite what I was getting at (they had the same problem at Deeside, I think...) and I do have difficulties with the word " de ", but then she said "Who doesn't?" So I felt very encouraged. I also took the opportunity to ask her about one or two things: 1) Direct preaching. Like I used to in Britain, I preach saying you - using "vous" when I am talking to the whole wide world and "tu" when I want it to feel as if I am addressing each person individually. French preachers tend to say rather "What will we do, what will one do". So I asked her if she felt my way was too direct, too brutal for the French ear. She said "I think you can get away with it with your English accent". In fact several people have commented on how much they appreciated being spoken to directly in preaching. 2) Liaisons Last...
Read more

A brief sortie to North Wales

 Following the Great Keswick Debacle, when our volunteering at the Keswick café was sabotaged by our assorted indispositions, we had airline tickets to use up. Yes, we had not taken travel insurance, so we paid even more money to change our tickets to fly for a short visit to North Wales. This time we were able to go. We passed extremely slowly through a very crowded Bordeaux airport but in good time to get our plane. All seats in the terminal were taken so we leaned against whatever we could find while waiting to board. Hey, bags need seats, too! though sometimes pointing out to Pat, "No, that's a bag seat", makes the bag find a new refuge on the lap of the person sitting next to it... Once on the plane we quickly found our allocated seats - right at the back on the left hand side - stowed our bags and the flight was smooth and uneventful.  We had 30 minutes in Manchester to disembark, get through immigration , hustle off to the station and board our train for Shotton. I...
Read more